FPRA Annual Conference: A Case Study - The Terri Schiavo Case
Craig Waters, Director of Public Information for the Florida Supreme Court, and Mike Bell, Vice President of Development and Community Relations for The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast, discussed the Terri Schiavo case and their experience working with the media during her final months. The two shared their lessons learned from the case.

Some members privately mentioned to me that they felt the topic was too controversial for a conference session. I completely disagree with that sentiment. Crisis communication is a critical responsibility for public relations professionals, and crises sometimes involve controversy. Furthermore, good case studies should not be simple issues.
The key lesson from the Schiavo case, from a public relations perspective, is that Waters and Bell approached the situation with objectivity and professionalism.
Waters professed that crises should be planned for in advance and a systematic process should be followed. Waters also recommended treated all media fairly, showing no favoritism.
Bell advised the audience to stick to the facts and be honest at all times. During the Schiavo case, his organization remained objective and took steps to not be associated with either side of the issue.
Waters categorized the case as "an intensely personal case involving a family." He stated that he saw his role as keeping a behind-the-scenes role and serving as a resource for information.
Waters also discussed his experience representing the Florida Supreme Court and dealing with global media during the 2000 presidential election.
In discussing lessons learned, Bell mentioned his awe of the power of individual words and phrases. He worked hard to avoid loaded words like "protesters" and "starvation." Waters advocated advanced planning and cooperative working relationships with the media and different constituencies.





Visitor Comments
As a Chamber of Commerce executive I know firsthand the tactics that were used in the Schiavo case. Over a 48 hour period beginning March 22, 2005, chambers of commerce in Florida were targeted with the messages such as the two that follow:
"Dear Chambers of Commerce,
I do upward of $100K business with Florida each year. It is not much, but my company will be establishing a policy of no contracts in your state. Abuse the handicapped if you wish, but not withour participation."
or
"Dear Florida Chamber of Commerce,
I cannot believe how corrupt the FLORIDA court actions regarding Terri Shiavo have been, and also the lack of responsible media reporting of this case. This poor defenseless woman (Terri Shiavo) is being sentenced to death by starvation and dehydration. We do not even treat animals or criminals in this way! FLORIDA is soon to be no longer known as the SUNSHINE state, but rather the DEATH STATE!
Please stand-up and take a stand for Terri Shiavo! Take what ever actions necessary to re-insert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube! My personal response to the people and businesses of Florida is to totally Boycott all FLORIDA businesses, due to the OUTRAGEOUS treatment and lack of concern for the life of Florida Resident Terri Shiavo."
We received more than 40 such messages, some in multiples. All threatened economic sanctions or boycotts.
My point is, this session could not be more timely and pertinent. Controversy is what we deal with when we really earn our money.
Way to go FPRA!
Posted by: Bob Gernert | August 8, 2006 03:58 PM