FPRA Annual Conference: What Do You Think of the Conference Coverage?
Posted by Chris Gent on August 7, 2007 at 02:46 PM
We're now at the halfway point of the conference and figured it was a good time to ask what you think about our conference coverage thus far. Tell us the good, the bad and the ugly. We'd prefer if you left your email so we can respond to you, but if you feel the need to be anonymous, go ahead.
What has been your favorite portion of the conference coverage?
Do you like the fact that we've included commentary on the sessions or would you just prefer the facts from presentations?
Do you like the fun stuff and hallway interviews?
Suggestions?
Visitor Comments
I feel very connected to the conference and have enjoyed the blog coverage. The summaries of the breakout sessions are perfect. I am particularly enjoying the candid photos and hallway interviews. It really makes me feel like I know what is going on down there, since I was not able to attend. The Ritz looks beautiful as well.
NICE WORK! :)
Posted by: Ashley | August 7, 2007 02:43 PM
Although reading a blog, seeing pictures, and hearing sound bites of interviews is not the same experience as those who are attending the conference in person, it sure does have value! The posts about the speakers… Aaron Cushman, the hallway interviews, and fun stuff all give those who are unable to attend a feeling of what it’s like to be there as well as valuable information. It also connects us to the conference in some way and keeps us in the loop. Thank you to all the bloggers for the time and effort you have dedicated to creating another successful blog!
Posted by: Rachael | August 7, 2007 04:12 PM